Contract law uk revision

See full list on thestudentroom. Husband promised £a week to wife. Following divorce, the wife’s claim for this failed. Agreement to pay income if she paid off the mortgage was legally binding.

Mother gave allowance for Bar study, and then provided a house.

Mother sought repossession and daughter failed to prove contractual nature. Lodger and two others. Free world cup tokens with every gallons of petrol. Customs claimed purchase tax.

Esso were trying to boost business, hence intention to be bound. M entered competition for Clio. RB claimed no intention, but this was not upheld.

No hint in transcript. Enforceable contracts 2. Necessaries – according to station in life and suit the requirements at the time 2. C refused to pay cost of funeral for her private benefit, but the court refuted this. Cambridge undergraduate supplied with £1worth of waistcoats. These were to his station of life, but not required – unenforceable against Inman 2. Suffering at the time of contracting to the extent of incomprehension?

Voidable by mental party 2. Contract made in a period of lucidity? Ratification possible 3. Terms – attach liability 2. Misrepresentations – attach liability 3. Mere opinions – no liability 4. Importance of representation 1. Puffs with specific promise 7. Heifer unserve yet having calve despite reassurances 1.

I am not interested in knowing the price of them” 2. Knowledge or skill affecting equality of bargaining strength 2. Where party tries to show written document does not reflect agreement, parol evidence prevents admission on the basis of uncertainty and presumption omission was for a reason. Rectification (written inaccurately represents agreement, equity allows admission) 2. Signed agreements – prima facie bound 1. Purchaser of vending machine bound even though she had not read clause 2. Express knowledge at time of contracting 2. Notice on wall, after the contract had been made 2. B stored orange juice for many years in S warehouse. Went missing, B claimed negligence and exclusion clause sent on receipts after contr.

Queries and oral misrepresentations 1. Claimant took wedding dress, querying “any damage howsoever arriving”, orally told it applied to beads and sequins, hence, CCD cannot rely. Effect on third parties 2. Third party and Sc contracted for carriage of chemicals, third party exclusion clause limits damage to $500. Stevedores, Si, do $5damage and cannot rely. Hostile to ambiguities 1. Clause: “not liable for damage caused by fire to customers’ cars on the premises” – fire caused by negligence, not specific enough 2. Fundamental Breach 2. The revocation must occur before the offer has been accepted , or else the agreement must be honoured.

Finally, a lapse of time may render an offer terminated. Obviously, some offers are time-limited and this time limit forms a condition of accepting the offer. TREITEL) FORMATION OF A CONTRACT : How to create rights and obligations, which will be enforced law ? The English courts’ approach to the doctrine of consideration is artificial since it has very little to do with the parties’ agreement.

A change in the law is imperative to ensure clarity in the law and to stop a slavish adherence to the neo-classical theory of contract law. Essentially, it is an award for damages to place the injured party in the position they would have been had the contract actually been performed. The dominant source of contract law is common law , whereby the previous decisions of the courts form part of the current law.

As such, this book is applicable to any student studying Law at an English university. The contract law revision notes guide was exactly what I needed to crack my exam. Karolina explained everything in simple words, so I finally got what my lectures were about. Do you know the difference between an offer and an invitation to treat? The book starts with an introduction explaining how to use the book.

The book then looks at offer and acceptance, certainty of terms, consideration and intention to create legal relations. English contract law is a body of law regulating contracts in England and Wales. With its roots in the lex mercatoria and the activism of the judiciary during the industrial revolution, it shares a heritage with countries across the Commonwealth (such as Australia, Canada, India), and to a lesser extent the United States.

There are statutory exceptions to this rule.